Vertical · Fintech
Payments, rails, and who carries the risk
This vertical tracks payments infrastructure, bank-fintech partnerships, stablecoins, and licensing — with attention to who carries settlement risk, reserve backing, and compliance burden once a new rail promises to route around an old one. Every published piece cites primary filings, regulator guidance, or company disclosure, not press-release framing.
By Nicholas Garcia — Lecturer, NUS School of Computing · Deputy Director, NUS FinTech Lab
Published pieces
Public memo
5 min read
Synapse Financial Technologies' April 2024 collapse left a $60–90 million shortfall between partner-bank records and its own ledgers. Supervisors and courts care which legal entity failed — complaint ownership is the product architecture.
Reader decision
When the app, the bank, and the middleware disagree, which entity answers for the customer's money?
Public memo
6 min read
An MAS payment-services licence is a Singapore supervisory status under the Payment Services Act — SPI thresholds, capital rules, and all. It is a credibility signal in Jakarta or Manila, not authorization to operate there.
Reader decision
Is the diligence on Singapore status, or on host-country authorization?
Public memo
5 min read
NYDFS guidance requires redeemability, segregation, and monthly attestation. The March 2023 SVB collapse trapped $3.3 billion of USDC reserves and broke the peg anyway — reserve access, not issuance, is the real product.
Reader decision
Does the issuer's attestation cover redemption speed, or only reserve existence?
Public memo
5 min read
Sponsor banks rent charter and balance-sheet access; fintechs rent UX and acquisition. Interagency guidance from June 2023 and a July 2024 joint statement say the bank keeps the compliance liability regardless of who owns the app.
Reader decision
Who inventories the third party, and who answers to the examiner when it fails?
Public memo
5 min read
The UK's Faster Payments reimbursement rule caps consumer scam losses at £85,000; in the US, Zelle disputes topped $206 million in 2023 with victims bearing most of the loss. Instant settlement moves the control burden before the send button.
Reader decision
Do fraud controls sit before the send button, or only in the recall window that instant rails just deleted?
More pieces are in the pipeline — card-network competition, cross-border remittance cost, and CBDC design are in active research. This vertical publishes only after sources clear the same bar as the five pieces above.